Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Standard

Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research : A Critical Appraisal. / Johansen, Mathilde; Thomsen, Simon Francis.

In: ISRN Biodiversity, Vol. 2016, 1346026, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Johansen, M & Thomsen, SF 2016, 'Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal', ISRN Biodiversity, vol. 2016, 1346026. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1346026

APA

Johansen, M., & Thomsen, S. F. (2016). Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal. ISRN Biodiversity, 2016, [1346026]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1346026

Vancouver

Johansen M, Thomsen SF. Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal. ISRN Biodiversity. 2016;2016. 1346026. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1346026

Author

Johansen, Mathilde ; Thomsen, Simon Francis. / Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research : A Critical Appraisal. In: ISRN Biodiversity. 2016 ; Vol. 2016.

Bibtex

@article{bb4b1b14fe914e1b87404a6d117ab479,
title = "Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal",
abstract = "As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.",
author = "Mathilde Johansen and Thomsen, {Simon Francis}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1155/2016/1346026",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
journal = "ISRN Biodiversity",
issn = "2356-7872",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research

T2 - A Critical Appraisal

AU - Johansen, Mathilde

AU - Thomsen, Simon Francis

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.

AB - As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.

U2 - 10.1155/2016/1346026

DO - 10.1155/2016/1346026

M3 - Review

C2 - 27382637

VL - 2016

JO - ISRN Biodiversity

JF - ISRN Biodiversity

SN - 2356-7872

M1 - 1346026

ER -

ID: 167591083