Ethnogovernmentality: The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Ethnogovernmentality : The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo. / Hoffmann, Kasper.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 119, 2021, p. 251-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hoffmann, K 2021, 'Ethnogovernmentality: The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo', Geoforum, vol. 119, pp. 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002

APA

Hoffmann, K. (2021). Ethnogovernmentality: The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo. Geoforum, 119, 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002

Vancouver

Hoffmann K. Ethnogovernmentality: The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo. Geoforum. 2021;119:251-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002

Author

Hoffmann, Kasper. / Ethnogovernmentality : The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo. In: Geoforum. 2021 ; Vol. 119. pp. 251-267.

Bibtex

@article{3ac4924d3b5d482d944bb43ad165dc68,
title = "Ethnogovernmentality: The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo",
abstract = "In this article I investigate colonial constructions of ethnicity and territory and their effects in the post-independence period in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. The core argument of the article is that the constructions of ethnicity and territory that are set in motion in struggles over political space in the Congolese conflicts are conditioned by what I call “ethnogovernmentality”, which denotes a heterogeneous ensemble of biopolitical and territorial rationalities and practices of power concerned with the conduct of conduct of ethnic populations. Through ethnogovernmentality colonial authorities sought to impose ordered scientific visions of ethnicity, custom, culture, space, territory, and geography, upon ambivalent cultures and spaces. I show that while ethnogovernmentality failed to produce the stability and order the colonial authorities sought, its ethno-territorial regime of truth and practice has had durable effects on people{\textquoteright}s sense of self and on struggles over political space.",
author = "Kasper Hoffmann",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "251--267",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnogovernmentality

T2 - The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo

AU - Hoffmann, Kasper

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - In this article I investigate colonial constructions of ethnicity and territory and their effects in the post-independence period in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. The core argument of the article is that the constructions of ethnicity and territory that are set in motion in struggles over political space in the Congolese conflicts are conditioned by what I call “ethnogovernmentality”, which denotes a heterogeneous ensemble of biopolitical and territorial rationalities and practices of power concerned with the conduct of conduct of ethnic populations. Through ethnogovernmentality colonial authorities sought to impose ordered scientific visions of ethnicity, custom, culture, space, territory, and geography, upon ambivalent cultures and spaces. I show that while ethnogovernmentality failed to produce the stability and order the colonial authorities sought, its ethno-territorial regime of truth and practice has had durable effects on people’s sense of self and on struggles over political space.

AB - In this article I investigate colonial constructions of ethnicity and territory and their effects in the post-independence period in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. The core argument of the article is that the constructions of ethnicity and territory that are set in motion in struggles over political space in the Congolese conflicts are conditioned by what I call “ethnogovernmentality”, which denotes a heterogeneous ensemble of biopolitical and territorial rationalities and practices of power concerned with the conduct of conduct of ethnic populations. Through ethnogovernmentality colonial authorities sought to impose ordered scientific visions of ethnicity, custom, culture, space, territory, and geography, upon ambivalent cultures and spaces. I show that while ethnogovernmentality failed to produce the stability and order the colonial authorities sought, its ethno-territorial regime of truth and practice has had durable effects on people’s sense of self and on struggles over political space.

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 119

SP - 251

EP - 267

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -

ID: 229901499