Ethnogovernmentality: The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Ethnogovernmentality : The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo. / Hoffmann, Kasper.
In: Geoforum, Vol. 119, 2021, p. 251-267.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethnogovernmentality
T2 - The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo
AU - Hoffmann, Kasper
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In this article I investigate colonial constructions of ethnicity and territory and their effects in the post-independence period in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. The core argument of the article is that the constructions of ethnicity and territory that are set in motion in struggles over political space in the Congolese conflicts are conditioned by what I call “ethnogovernmentality”, which denotes a heterogeneous ensemble of biopolitical and territorial rationalities and practices of power concerned with the conduct of conduct of ethnic populations. Through ethnogovernmentality colonial authorities sought to impose ordered scientific visions of ethnicity, custom, culture, space, territory, and geography, upon ambivalent cultures and spaces. I show that while ethnogovernmentality failed to produce the stability and order the colonial authorities sought, its ethno-territorial regime of truth and practice has had durable effects on people’s sense of self and on struggles over political space.
AB - In this article I investigate colonial constructions of ethnicity and territory and their effects in the post-independence period in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. The core argument of the article is that the constructions of ethnicity and territory that are set in motion in struggles over political space in the Congolese conflicts are conditioned by what I call “ethnogovernmentality”, which denotes a heterogeneous ensemble of biopolitical and territorial rationalities and practices of power concerned with the conduct of conduct of ethnic populations. Through ethnogovernmentality colonial authorities sought to impose ordered scientific visions of ethnicity, custom, culture, space, territory, and geography, upon ambivalent cultures and spaces. I show that while ethnogovernmentality failed to produce the stability and order the colonial authorities sought, its ethno-territorial regime of truth and practice has had durable effects on people’s sense of self and on struggles over political space.
U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002
DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002
M3 - Journal article
VL - 119
SP - 251
EP - 267
JO - Geoforum
JF - Geoforum
SN - 0016-7185
ER -
ID: 229901499