TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservative treatment of main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

T2 - Full-time or nighttime bracing?

AU - Ohrt-Nissen, Søren

AU - Lastikka, Markus

AU - Andersen, Thomas Borbjerg

AU - Helenius, Ilkka

AU - Gehrchen, Martin

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Purpose: To compare treatment efficacy between the Boston full-time brace and the Providence part-time brace in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: Patients were treated with either the Boston brace (n = 37) or the Providence brace (n = 40). Inclusion criteria were Risser grade ≤2, major curve between 25° and 40° with the apex of the curve between T7 and T11 vertebrae. Two-year follow-up was available in all patients unless brace treatment had reached endpoint. The primary outcome measure was main curve progression to ≥45°. Results: Median age was 12.6 years and median treatment length at follow-up was 25 months (interquartile range (IQR): 18–32)) with no difference between the groups (p ≥ 0.116). Initial median main Cobb angle was 29° (IQR: 27–33) and 36° (IQR: 33–38) in the Boston and Providence groups, respectively (p < 0.001). At follow-up, 13 patients (35%) had progressed to ≥45° in the Boston group versus 16 patients (40%) in the Providence group (p = 0.838). Twenty-three patients (62%) had progressed by more than 5° in the Boston group versus 22 patients (55%) in the Providence group (p = 0.685). The secondary thoracolumbar/lumbar curve progressed by more than 5° in 14 (38%) and 18 (45%) in the Boston and Providence groups, respectively (p = 0.548). Conclusions: Despite a larger initial curve size in the Providence group, progression of more than 5° or to surgical indication area was similar in the Boston group. Our results indicate that nighttime bracing is a viable alternative to full-time bracing also in main thoracic AIS.

AB - Purpose: To compare treatment efficacy between the Boston full-time brace and the Providence part-time brace in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: Patients were treated with either the Boston brace (n = 37) or the Providence brace (n = 40). Inclusion criteria were Risser grade ≤2, major curve between 25° and 40° with the apex of the curve between T7 and T11 vertebrae. Two-year follow-up was available in all patients unless brace treatment had reached endpoint. The primary outcome measure was main curve progression to ≥45°. Results: Median age was 12.6 years and median treatment length at follow-up was 25 months (interquartile range (IQR): 18–32)) with no difference between the groups (p ≥ 0.116). Initial median main Cobb angle was 29° (IQR: 27–33) and 36° (IQR: 33–38) in the Boston and Providence groups, respectively (p < 0.001). At follow-up, 13 patients (35%) had progressed to ≥45° in the Boston group versus 16 patients (40%) in the Providence group (p = 0.838). Twenty-three patients (62%) had progressed by more than 5° in the Boston group versus 22 patients (55%) in the Providence group (p = 0.685). The secondary thoracolumbar/lumbar curve progressed by more than 5° in 14 (38%) and 18 (45%) in the Boston and Providence groups, respectively (p = 0.548). Conclusions: Despite a larger initial curve size in the Providence group, progression of more than 5° or to surgical indication area was similar in the Boston group. Our results indicate that nighttime bracing is a viable alternative to full-time bracing also in main thoracic AIS.

KW - adolescent

KW - braces

KW - disease progression

KW - orthotic devices

KW - scoliosis

KW - scoliosis/therapy

U2 - 10.1177/2309499019860017

DO - 10.1177/2309499019860017

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31284817

AN - SCOPUS:85068936168

VL - 27

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery

SN - 1022-5536

IS - 2

ER -