Comparison of computational methods for the identification of cell cycle-regulated genes
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review
Standard
Comparison of computational methods for the identification of cell cycle-regulated genes. / de Lichtenberg, Ulrik; Jensen, Lars Juhl; Fausbøll, Anders; Jensen, Thomas Skøt; Bork, Peer; Brunak, Søren.
In: Bioinformatics, Vol. 21, No. 7, 2005, p. 1164-71.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of computational methods for the identification of cell cycle-regulated genes
AU - de Lichtenberg, Ulrik
AU - Jensen, Lars Juhl
AU - Fausbøll, Anders
AU - Jensen, Thomas Skøt
AU - Bork, Peer
AU - Brunak, Søren
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - MOTIVATION: DNA microarrays have been used extensively to study the cell cycle transcription programme in a number of model organisms. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae data in particular have been subjected to a wide range of bioinformatics analysis methods, aimed at identifying the correct and complete set of periodically expressed genes. RESULTS: Here, we provide the first thorough benchmark of such methods, surprisingly revealing that most new and more mathematically advanced methods actually perform worse than the analysis published with the original microarray data sets. We show that this loss of accuracy specifically affects methods that only model the shape of the expression profile without taking into account the magnitude of regulation. We present a simple permutation-based method that performs better than most existing methods.
AB - MOTIVATION: DNA microarrays have been used extensively to study the cell cycle transcription programme in a number of model organisms. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae data in particular have been subjected to a wide range of bioinformatics analysis methods, aimed at identifying the correct and complete set of periodically expressed genes. RESULTS: Here, we provide the first thorough benchmark of such methods, surprisingly revealing that most new and more mathematically advanced methods actually perform worse than the analysis published with the original microarray data sets. We show that this loss of accuracy specifically affects methods that only model the shape of the expression profile without taking into account the magnitude of regulation. We present a simple permutation-based method that performs better than most existing methods.
U2 - 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti093
DO - 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti093
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 15513999
VL - 21
SP - 1164
EP - 1171
JO - Computer Applications in the Biosciences
JF - Computer Applications in the Biosciences
SN - 1471-2105
IS - 7
ER -
ID: 40740656