Classification of loneliness using the T-ILS: Is it as simple as it seems?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Classification of loneliness using the T-ILS : Is it as simple as it seems? / Nielsen, Tine; Friderichsen, Ida S.; Rayce, Signe Boe.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2021, p. 104-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Nielsen, T, Friderichsen, IS & Rayce, SB 2021, 'Classification of loneliness using the T-ILS: Is it as simple as it seems?', Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12697

APA

Nielsen, T., Friderichsen, I. S., & Rayce, S. B. (2021). Classification of loneliness using the T-ILS: Is it as simple as it seems? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62(1), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12697

Vancouver

Nielsen T, Friderichsen IS, Rayce SB. Classification of loneliness using the T-ILS: Is it as simple as it seems? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2021;62(1):104-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12697

Author

Nielsen, Tine ; Friderichsen, Ida S. ; Rayce, Signe Boe. / Classification of loneliness using the T-ILS : Is it as simple as it seems?. In: Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2021 ; Vol. 62, No. 1. pp. 104-115.

Bibtex

@article{26d68314d0914cbc90bfa2d50b52ae25,
title = "Classification of loneliness using the T-ILS: Is it as simple as it seems?",
abstract = "Student well-being is a growing issue in higher education, and assessment of the prevalence of conditions as loneliness is therefore important. In higher education and population surveys the Three-Item Loneliness Scale (T-ILS) is used increasingly. The T-ILS is attractive for large multi-subject surveys, as it consists of only three items (derived from the UCLA Loneliness Scale). Several ways of classifying persons as lonely based on T-ILS scores exist: dichotomous and trichotomous classification schemes and use of sum scores with rising levels indicating more loneliness. The question remains whether T-ILS scores are comparable across the different population groups where they are used or across groups of students in the higher education system. The aim was to investigate whether the T-ILS suffers from differential item functioning (DIF) that might change the loneliness classification among higher education students, using a large sample just admitted to 22 different academy profession degree programs in Denmark (N = 3,757). DIF was tested relative to degree program, age groups and gender. The framework of graphical loglinear Rasch models was applied, as this allows for adjustment of sum scores for uniform DIF, and thus for assessment of whether DIF might change the classification. Two items showed DIF relative to degree program and gender, and adjusting for this DIF changed the classification for some subgroups. The consequences were negligible when using a dichotomous classification and larger when using a trichotomous classification. Therefore, trichotomous classification should be used with caution unless suitable adjustments for DIF are done prior to classification.",
keywords = "Classification, differential item functioning, higher education, loneliness, prevalence, MENTAL-HEALTH, OLDER-ADULTS, RASCH MODEL, SCALE, DEPRESSION, VALIDITY, LIFE, UCLA, RELIABILITY, PREVALENCE",
author = "Tine Nielsen and Friderichsen, {Ida S.} and Rayce, {Signe Boe}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1111/sjop.12697",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "104--115",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0036-5564",
publisher = "The Scandinavian Psychological Associations",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification of loneliness using the T-ILS

T2 - Is it as simple as it seems?

AU - Nielsen, Tine

AU - Friderichsen, Ida S.

AU - Rayce, Signe Boe

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Student well-being is a growing issue in higher education, and assessment of the prevalence of conditions as loneliness is therefore important. In higher education and population surveys the Three-Item Loneliness Scale (T-ILS) is used increasingly. The T-ILS is attractive for large multi-subject surveys, as it consists of only three items (derived from the UCLA Loneliness Scale). Several ways of classifying persons as lonely based on T-ILS scores exist: dichotomous and trichotomous classification schemes and use of sum scores with rising levels indicating more loneliness. The question remains whether T-ILS scores are comparable across the different population groups where they are used or across groups of students in the higher education system. The aim was to investigate whether the T-ILS suffers from differential item functioning (DIF) that might change the loneliness classification among higher education students, using a large sample just admitted to 22 different academy profession degree programs in Denmark (N = 3,757). DIF was tested relative to degree program, age groups and gender. The framework of graphical loglinear Rasch models was applied, as this allows for adjustment of sum scores for uniform DIF, and thus for assessment of whether DIF might change the classification. Two items showed DIF relative to degree program and gender, and adjusting for this DIF changed the classification for some subgroups. The consequences were negligible when using a dichotomous classification and larger when using a trichotomous classification. Therefore, trichotomous classification should be used with caution unless suitable adjustments for DIF are done prior to classification.

AB - Student well-being is a growing issue in higher education, and assessment of the prevalence of conditions as loneliness is therefore important. In higher education and population surveys the Three-Item Loneliness Scale (T-ILS) is used increasingly. The T-ILS is attractive for large multi-subject surveys, as it consists of only three items (derived from the UCLA Loneliness Scale). Several ways of classifying persons as lonely based on T-ILS scores exist: dichotomous and trichotomous classification schemes and use of sum scores with rising levels indicating more loneliness. The question remains whether T-ILS scores are comparable across the different population groups where they are used or across groups of students in the higher education system. The aim was to investigate whether the T-ILS suffers from differential item functioning (DIF) that might change the loneliness classification among higher education students, using a large sample just admitted to 22 different academy profession degree programs in Denmark (N = 3,757). DIF was tested relative to degree program, age groups and gender. The framework of graphical loglinear Rasch models was applied, as this allows for adjustment of sum scores for uniform DIF, and thus for assessment of whether DIF might change the classification. Two items showed DIF relative to degree program and gender, and adjusting for this DIF changed the classification for some subgroups. The consequences were negligible when using a dichotomous classification and larger when using a trichotomous classification. Therefore, trichotomous classification should be used with caution unless suitable adjustments for DIF are done prior to classification.

KW - Classification

KW - differential item functioning

KW - higher education

KW - loneliness

KW - prevalence

KW - MENTAL-HEALTH

KW - OLDER-ADULTS

KW - RASCH MODEL

KW - SCALE

KW - DEPRESSION

KW - VALIDITY

KW - LIFE

KW - UCLA

KW - RELIABILITY

KW - PREVALENCE

U2 - 10.1111/sjop.12697

DO - 10.1111/sjop.12697

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33320357

VL - 62

SP - 104

EP - 115

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

SN - 0036-5564

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 254773254