Cholesterol not particle concentration mediates the atherogenic risk conferred by apolipoprotein B particles - A Mendelian randomization analysis
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Documents
- Fulltext
Final published version, 765 KB, PDF document
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The causal contribution of apolipoprotein B (apoB) particles to coronary artery disease (CAD) is established. We examined whether this atherogenic contribution is better reflected by non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) or apoB particle concentration.
METHOD AND RESULTS: We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using 235 variants as genetic instruments; testing the relationship between their effects on the exposures, non-HDL-C and apoB, and on the outcome CAD using weighted regression. Variant effect estimates on the exposures came from the UK Biobank (N = 376,336) and on the outcome from a meta-analysis of five CAD data-sets (187,451 cases and 793,315 controls). Subsequently, we carried out sensitivity and replication analyses.In univariate MR analysis both exposures associated with CAD (βnon-HDL-C = 0.40, P = 2.8 × 10-48 and βapoB = 0.38, P = 1.3 × 10-44). Adding effects on non-HDL-C into a model that already included those on apoB significantly improved the genetically predicted CAD effects (P = 3.9 × 10-5), while adding apoB into the model including non-HDL-C did not (P = 0.69). Thirty-five percent (82/235) of the variants used as genetic instruments had discordant effects on the exposures, associating with non-HDL-C/apoB ratio at P < 2.1 × 10-4 (0.05/235). Fifty-one variants associated at genome-wide significance.
CONCLUSION: Many sequence variants have discordant effects on non-HDL-C and apoB. These variants allowed us to show that the causal mechanism underlying the relationship between apolipoprotein B particles and CAD is more associated with non-HDL-C than apoB particle concentration.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | European Journal of Preventive Cardiology |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 18 |
Pages (from-to) | 2374–2385 |
ISSN | 2047-4873 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk
ID: 321785706