Cholesterol not particle concentration mediates the atherogenic risk conferred by apolipoprotein B particles - A Mendelian randomization analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 765 KB, PDF document

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The causal contribution of apolipoprotein B (apoB) particles to coronary artery disease (CAD) is established. We examined whether this atherogenic contribution is better reflected by non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) or apoB particle concentration.

METHOD AND RESULTS: We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using 235 variants as genetic instruments; testing the relationship between their effects on the exposures, non-HDL-C and apoB, and on the outcome CAD using weighted regression. Variant effect estimates on the exposures came from the UK Biobank (N = 376,336) and on the outcome from a meta-analysis of five CAD data-sets (187,451 cases and 793,315 controls). Subsequently, we carried out sensitivity and replication analyses.In univariate MR analysis both exposures associated with CAD (βnon-HDL-C = 0.40, P = 2.8 × 10-48 and βapoB = 0.38, P = 1.3 × 10-44). Adding effects on non-HDL-C into a model that already included those on apoB significantly improved the genetically predicted CAD effects (P = 3.9 × 10-5), while adding apoB into the model including non-HDL-C did not (P = 0.69). Thirty-five percent (82/235) of the variants used as genetic instruments had discordant effects on the exposures, associating with non-HDL-C/apoB ratio at P < 2.1 × 10-4 (0.05/235). Fifty-one variants associated at genome-wide significance.

CONCLUSION: Many sequence variants have discordant effects on non-HDL-C and apoB. These variants allowed us to show that the causal mechanism underlying the relationship between apolipoprotein B particles and CAD is more associated with non-HDL-C than apoB particle concentration.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Volume29
Issue number18
Pages (from-to)2374–2385
ISSN2047-4873
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 321785706