Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy. / Cold, Kristoffer Mazanti; Svendsen, Morten Bo Søndergaard; Bodtger, Uffe; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy; Clementsen, Paul Frost; Konge, Lars.

In: Respiration, Vol. 100, 2021, p. 347–355.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Cold, KM, Svendsen, MBS, Bodtger, U, Nayahangan, LJ, Clementsen, PF & Konge, L 2021, 'Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy', Respiration, vol. 100, pp. 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1159/000513433

APA

Cold, K. M., Svendsen, M. B. S., Bodtger, U., Nayahangan, L. J., Clementsen, P. F., & Konge, L. (2021). Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy. Respiration, 100, 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1159/000513433

Vancouver

Cold KM, Svendsen MBS, Bodtger U, Nayahangan LJ, Clementsen PF, Konge L. Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy. Respiration. 2021;100:347–355. https://doi.org/10.1159/000513433

Author

Cold, Kristoffer Mazanti ; Svendsen, Morten Bo Søndergaard ; Bodtger, Uffe ; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy ; Clementsen, Paul Frost ; Konge, Lars. / Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy. In: Respiration. 2021 ; Vol. 100. pp. 347–355.

Bibtex

@article{51b4327c9d6e43a8ad8e02a3e9c282f7,
title = "Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy",
abstract = "Background: Motor skills have been identified as a useful measure to evaluate competency in bronchoscopy. However, no automatic assessment system of motor skills with a clear pass/fail criterion in flexible bronchoscopy exists. Objectives: The objective of the study was to develop an objective and automatic measure of motor skills in bronchoscopy and set a pass/fail criterion. Methods: Participants conducted 3 bronchoscopies each in a simulated setting. They were equipped with a Myo Armband that measured lower arm movements through an inertial measurement unit, and hand and finger motions through electromyography sensors. These measures were composed into an objective and automatic composite score of motor skills, the motor bronchoscopy skills score (MoBSS). Results: Twelve novices, eleven intermediates, and ten expert bronchoscopy operators participated, resulting in 99 procedures available for assessment. MoBSS was correlated with a higher diagnostic completeness (Pearson's correlation, r = 0.43, p < 0.001) and a lower procedure time (Pearson's correlation, r = -0.90, p < 0.001). MoBSS was able to differentiate operator performance based on the experience level (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). Using the contrasting groups' method, a passing score of -0.08 MoBSS was defined that failed 30/36 (83%) novice, 5/33 (15%) intermediate, and 1/30 (3%) expert procedures. Conclusions: MoBSS can be used as an automatic and unbiased assessment tool for motor skills performance in flexible bronchoscopy. MoBSS has the potential to generate automatic feedback to help guide trainees toward expert performance.",
author = "Cold, {Kristoffer Mazanti} and Svendsen, {Morten Bo S{\o}ndergaard} and Uffe Bodtger and Nayahangan, {Leizl Joy} and Clementsen, {Paul Frost} and Lars Konge",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1159/000513433",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "347–355",
journal = "Respiration",
issn = "0025-7931",
publisher = "S Karger AG",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy

AU - Cold, Kristoffer Mazanti

AU - Svendsen, Morten Bo Søndergaard

AU - Bodtger, Uffe

AU - Nayahangan, Leizl Joy

AU - Clementsen, Paul Frost

AU - Konge, Lars

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: Motor skills have been identified as a useful measure to evaluate competency in bronchoscopy. However, no automatic assessment system of motor skills with a clear pass/fail criterion in flexible bronchoscopy exists. Objectives: The objective of the study was to develop an objective and automatic measure of motor skills in bronchoscopy and set a pass/fail criterion. Methods: Participants conducted 3 bronchoscopies each in a simulated setting. They were equipped with a Myo Armband that measured lower arm movements through an inertial measurement unit, and hand and finger motions through electromyography sensors. These measures were composed into an objective and automatic composite score of motor skills, the motor bronchoscopy skills score (MoBSS). Results: Twelve novices, eleven intermediates, and ten expert bronchoscopy operators participated, resulting in 99 procedures available for assessment. MoBSS was correlated with a higher diagnostic completeness (Pearson's correlation, r = 0.43, p < 0.001) and a lower procedure time (Pearson's correlation, r = -0.90, p < 0.001). MoBSS was able to differentiate operator performance based on the experience level (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). Using the contrasting groups' method, a passing score of -0.08 MoBSS was defined that failed 30/36 (83%) novice, 5/33 (15%) intermediate, and 1/30 (3%) expert procedures. Conclusions: MoBSS can be used as an automatic and unbiased assessment tool for motor skills performance in flexible bronchoscopy. MoBSS has the potential to generate automatic feedback to help guide trainees toward expert performance.

AB - Background: Motor skills have been identified as a useful measure to evaluate competency in bronchoscopy. However, no automatic assessment system of motor skills with a clear pass/fail criterion in flexible bronchoscopy exists. Objectives: The objective of the study was to develop an objective and automatic measure of motor skills in bronchoscopy and set a pass/fail criterion. Methods: Participants conducted 3 bronchoscopies each in a simulated setting. They were equipped with a Myo Armband that measured lower arm movements through an inertial measurement unit, and hand and finger motions through electromyography sensors. These measures were composed into an objective and automatic composite score of motor skills, the motor bronchoscopy skills score (MoBSS). Results: Twelve novices, eleven intermediates, and ten expert bronchoscopy operators participated, resulting in 99 procedures available for assessment. MoBSS was correlated with a higher diagnostic completeness (Pearson's correlation, r = 0.43, p < 0.001) and a lower procedure time (Pearson's correlation, r = -0.90, p < 0.001). MoBSS was able to differentiate operator performance based on the experience level (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). Using the contrasting groups' method, a passing score of -0.08 MoBSS was defined that failed 30/36 (83%) novice, 5/33 (15%) intermediate, and 1/30 (3%) expert procedures. Conclusions: MoBSS can be used as an automatic and unbiased assessment tool for motor skills performance in flexible bronchoscopy. MoBSS has the potential to generate automatic feedback to help guide trainees toward expert performance.

U2 - 10.1159/000513433

DO - 10.1159/000513433

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33550311

AN - SCOPUS:85100757472

VL - 100

SP - 347

EP - 355

JO - Respiration

JF - Respiration

SN - 0025-7931

ER -

ID: 257973797