Applying the Proportionality Principle to COVID-19 Antibody Testing

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to ravage the globe, many nations have started to relax stringent restrictions in an effort to restart the economy. While Member States of the European Union have approached reopening without the use of antibody testing for COVID-19, such testing may be central to a long-term, sustainable strategy for international travel, employment, and the allocation and monitoring of vaccines. As the use of antibody testing to dictate the enjoyment of individual freedom remains highly controversial, we describe its use in the context of three case studies (return to the workplace, travel and vaccination) applying a procedural and substantive legal balancing entailed in the proportionality principle. Differential treatments of individuals based on COVID-19 antibody test results can be justified through the proportionality principle, which offers a sound dividing line between a reasonable and responsible response and an unjust and discriminatory response.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Law and the Biosciences
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 4 Aug 2020

    Research areas

  • Faculty of Law - proportionaliy, Covid-19, testing, Freedom, Security and Justice, pandemic, law, international law

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and

No data available

ID: 242464763