Analysis in usability evaluations: an exploratory study

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Standard

Analysis in usability evaluations : an exploratory study. / Følstad, Asbjørn; Lai-Chong Law, Effie; Hornbæk, Kasper.

Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: extending boundaries . Association for Computing Machinery, 2010. p. 647-650.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Følstad, A, Lai-Chong Law, E & Hornbæk, K 2010, Analysis in usability evaluations: an exploratory study. in Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: extending boundaries . Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 647-650, 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Reykjavik, Iceland, 16/10/2010. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868995

APA

Følstad, A., Lai-Chong Law, E., & Hornbæk, K. (2010). Analysis in usability evaluations: an exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: extending boundaries (pp. 647-650). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868995

Vancouver

Følstad A, Lai-Chong Law E, Hornbæk K. Analysis in usability evaluations: an exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: extending boundaries . Association for Computing Machinery. 2010. p. 647-650 https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868995

Author

Følstad, Asbjørn ; Lai-Chong Law, Effie ; Hornbæk, Kasper. / Analysis in usability evaluations : an exploratory study. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: extending boundaries . Association for Computing Machinery, 2010. pp. 647-650

Bibtex

@inproceedings{ff75eefe1a9e4c1690ea3f7526cd1123,
title = "Analysis in usability evaluations: an exploratory study",
abstract = "While the planning and implementation of usability evaluations are well described in the literature, the analysis of the evaluation data is not. We present interviews with 11 usability professionals on how they conduct analysis, describing the resources, collaboration, creation of recommendations, and prioritization involved. The interviews indicate a lack of structure in the analysis process and suggest activities, such as generating recommendations, that are unsupported by existing methods. We discuss how to better support analysis, and propose four themes for future research on analysis in usability evaluations. ",
author = "Asbj{\o}rn F{\o}lstad and {Lai-Chong Law}, Effie and Kasper Hornb{\ae}k",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1145/1868914.1868995",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-60558-934-3",
pages = "647--650",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
note = "6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction : extending boundaries, NordiCHI 2010 ; Conference date: 16-10-2010 Through 20-10-2010",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Analysis in usability evaluations

T2 - 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

AU - Følstad, Asbjørn

AU - Lai-Chong Law, Effie

AU - Hornbæk, Kasper

N1 - Conference code: 6

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - While the planning and implementation of usability evaluations are well described in the literature, the analysis of the evaluation data is not. We present interviews with 11 usability professionals on how they conduct analysis, describing the resources, collaboration, creation of recommendations, and prioritization involved. The interviews indicate a lack of structure in the analysis process and suggest activities, such as generating recommendations, that are unsupported by existing methods. We discuss how to better support analysis, and propose four themes for future research on analysis in usability evaluations.

AB - While the planning and implementation of usability evaluations are well described in the literature, the analysis of the evaluation data is not. We present interviews with 11 usability professionals on how they conduct analysis, describing the resources, collaboration, creation of recommendations, and prioritization involved. The interviews indicate a lack of structure in the analysis process and suggest activities, such as generating recommendations, that are unsupported by existing methods. We discuss how to better support analysis, and propose four themes for future research on analysis in usability evaluations.

U2 - 10.1145/1868914.1868995

DO - 10.1145/1868914.1868995

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 978-1-60558-934-3

SP - 647

EP - 650

BT - Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

Y2 - 16 October 2010 through 20 October 2010

ER -

ID: 32431764