An emerging governmentality of climate change loss and damage
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
An emerging governmentality of climate change loss and damage. / Jackson, Guy; N'guetta, Alicia; De Rosa, Salvatore Paolo; Scown, Murray; Dorkenoo, Kelly; Chaffin, Brian C.; Boyd, Emily.
In: Progress in Environmental Geography, 2023.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - An emerging governmentality of climate change loss and damage
AU - Jackson, Guy
AU - N'guetta, Alicia
AU - De Rosa, Salvatore Paolo
AU - Scown, Murray
AU - Dorkenoo, Kelly
AU - Chaffin, Brian C.
AU - Boyd, Emily
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Loss and damage is the “third pillar” of international climate governance alongside mitigation and adaptation. When mitigation and adaptation fail, losses and damages occur. Scholars have been reacting to international political discourse centred around governing actual or potential severe losses and damages from climate change. Large gaps exist in relation to understanding the underlying power dimensions, rationalities, knowledges, and technologies of loss and damage governance and science. We draw from a Foucauldian-inspired governmentality framework to argue there is an emerging governmentality of loss and damage. We find, among other things, that root causes of loss and damage are being obscured, Western knowledge and technocratic interventions are centred, and there are colonial presupposed subjectivities of Global South victims of climate change, which are being contested by people bearing the brunt of the climate crisis. We propose future directions for critical research on climate change loss and damage.
AB - Loss and damage is the “third pillar” of international climate governance alongside mitigation and adaptation. When mitigation and adaptation fail, losses and damages occur. Scholars have been reacting to international political discourse centred around governing actual or potential severe losses and damages from climate change. Large gaps exist in relation to understanding the underlying power dimensions, rationalities, knowledges, and technologies of loss and damage governance and science. We draw from a Foucauldian-inspired governmentality framework to argue there is an emerging governmentality of loss and damage. We find, among other things, that root causes of loss and damage are being obscured, Western knowledge and technocratic interventions are centred, and there are colonial presupposed subjectivities of Global South victims of climate change, which are being contested by people bearing the brunt of the climate crisis. We propose future directions for critical research on climate change loss and damage.
KW - Climate governmentality
KW - loss and damage
KW - power
KW - rationality
KW - subjectivities
KW - UNFCCC
U2 - 10.1177/27539687221148748
DO - 10.1177/27539687221148748
M3 - Journal article
JO - Progress in Environmental Geography
JF - Progress in Environmental Geography
SN - 2753-9687
ER -
ID: 362740835