A Comparison Study of Vector Velocity, Spectral Doppler and Magnetic Resonance of Blood Flow in the Common Carotid Artery

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A Comparison Study of Vector Velocity, Spectral Doppler and Magnetic Resonance of Blood Flow in the Common Carotid Artery. / Brandt, Andreas Hjelm; Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov; Ewertsen, Caroline; Holbek, Simon; Olesen, Jacob Bjerring; Moshavegh, Ramin; Thomsen, Carsten; Jensen, Jørgen Arendt; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann.

In: Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Vol. 44, No. 8, 2018, p. 1751-1761.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Brandt, AH, Hansen, KL, Ewertsen, C, Holbek, S, Olesen, JB, Moshavegh, R, Thomsen, C, Jensen, JA & Nielsen, MB 2018, 'A Comparison Study of Vector Velocity, Spectral Doppler and Magnetic Resonance of Blood Flow in the Common Carotid Artery', Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1751-1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.002

APA

Brandt, A. H., Hansen, K. L., Ewertsen, C., Holbek, S., Olesen, J. B., Moshavegh, R., Thomsen, C., Jensen, J. A., & Nielsen, M. B. (2018). A Comparison Study of Vector Velocity, Spectral Doppler and Magnetic Resonance of Blood Flow in the Common Carotid Artery. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 44(8), 1751-1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.002

Vancouver

Brandt AH, Hansen KL, Ewertsen C, Holbek S, Olesen JB, Moshavegh R et al. A Comparison Study of Vector Velocity, Spectral Doppler and Magnetic Resonance of Blood Flow in the Common Carotid Artery. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2018;44(8):1751-1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.002

Author

Brandt, Andreas Hjelm ; Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov ; Ewertsen, Caroline ; Holbek, Simon ; Olesen, Jacob Bjerring ; Moshavegh, Ramin ; Thomsen, Carsten ; Jensen, Jørgen Arendt ; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann. / A Comparison Study of Vector Velocity, Spectral Doppler and Magnetic Resonance of Blood Flow in the Common Carotid Artery. In: Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2018 ; Vol. 44, No. 8. pp. 1751-1761.

Bibtex

@article{611adade086d4c0fa9345df5a6095cc9,
title = "A Comparison Study of Vector Velocity, Spectral Doppler and Magnetic Resonance of Blood Flow in the Common Carotid Artery",
abstract = "Magnetic resonance phase contrast angiography (MRA) is the gold standard for blood flow evaluation. Spectral Doppler ultrasound (SDU) is the first clinical choice, although the method is angle dependent. Vector flow imaging (VFI) is an angle-independent ultrasound method. The aim of the study was to compare VFI- and SDU-estimated peak systolic velocities (PSV) of the common carotid artery (CCA) with PSV obtained by MRA. Furthermore, intra- and inter-observer agreement was determined. MRA estimates were significantly different from SDU estimates (left CCA: p < 0.001, right CCA: p < 0.001), but not from VFI estimates (left CCA: p = 0.28, right CCA: p = 0.18). VFI measured lower PSV in both CCAs compared with SDU (p < 0.001) with improved precision (VFI: left: 24%, right: 18%; SDU: left 38%, right: 23%). Intra- and inter-observer agreement was almost perfect for VFI and SDU (inter-observer correlation coefficient: VFI 0.88, SDU 0.91; intra-observer correlation coefficient: VFI 0.96, SDU 0.97). VFI is more accurate than SDU in evaluating PSV compared with MRA.",
keywords = "Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Carotid Artery, Common/diagnostic imaging, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods",
author = "Brandt, {Andreas Hjelm} and Hansen, {Kristoffer Lindskov} and Caroline Ewertsen and Simon Holbek and Olesen, {Jacob Bjerring} and Ramin Moshavegh and Carsten Thomsen and Jensen, {J{\o}rgen Arendt} and Nielsen, {Michael Bachmann}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1751--1761",
journal = "Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology",
issn = "0301-5629",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison Study of Vector Velocity, Spectral Doppler and Magnetic Resonance of Blood Flow in the Common Carotid Artery

AU - Brandt, Andreas Hjelm

AU - Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov

AU - Ewertsen, Caroline

AU - Holbek, Simon

AU - Olesen, Jacob Bjerring

AU - Moshavegh, Ramin

AU - Thomsen, Carsten

AU - Jensen, Jørgen Arendt

AU - Nielsen, Michael Bachmann

N1 - Copyright © 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Magnetic resonance phase contrast angiography (MRA) is the gold standard for blood flow evaluation. Spectral Doppler ultrasound (SDU) is the first clinical choice, although the method is angle dependent. Vector flow imaging (VFI) is an angle-independent ultrasound method. The aim of the study was to compare VFI- and SDU-estimated peak systolic velocities (PSV) of the common carotid artery (CCA) with PSV obtained by MRA. Furthermore, intra- and inter-observer agreement was determined. MRA estimates were significantly different from SDU estimates (left CCA: p < 0.001, right CCA: p < 0.001), but not from VFI estimates (left CCA: p = 0.28, right CCA: p = 0.18). VFI measured lower PSV in both CCAs compared with SDU (p < 0.001) with improved precision (VFI: left: 24%, right: 18%; SDU: left 38%, right: 23%). Intra- and inter-observer agreement was almost perfect for VFI and SDU (inter-observer correlation coefficient: VFI 0.88, SDU 0.91; intra-observer correlation coefficient: VFI 0.96, SDU 0.97). VFI is more accurate than SDU in evaluating PSV compared with MRA.

AB - Magnetic resonance phase contrast angiography (MRA) is the gold standard for blood flow evaluation. Spectral Doppler ultrasound (SDU) is the first clinical choice, although the method is angle dependent. Vector flow imaging (VFI) is an angle-independent ultrasound method. The aim of the study was to compare VFI- and SDU-estimated peak systolic velocities (PSV) of the common carotid artery (CCA) with PSV obtained by MRA. Furthermore, intra- and inter-observer agreement was determined. MRA estimates were significantly different from SDU estimates (left CCA: p < 0.001, right CCA: p < 0.001), but not from VFI estimates (left CCA: p = 0.28, right CCA: p = 0.18). VFI measured lower PSV in both CCAs compared with SDU (p < 0.001) with improved precision (VFI: left: 24%, right: 18%; SDU: left 38%, right: 23%). Intra- and inter-observer agreement was almost perfect for VFI and SDU (inter-observer correlation coefficient: VFI 0.88, SDU 0.91; intra-observer correlation coefficient: VFI 0.96, SDU 0.97). VFI is more accurate than SDU in evaluating PSV compared with MRA.

KW - Adult

KW - Blood Flow Velocity

KW - Carotid Artery, Common/diagnostic imaging

KW - Female

KW - Hemodynamics

KW - Humans

KW - Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Reference Values

KW - Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods

U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.002

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29804906

VL - 44

SP - 1751

EP - 1761

JO - Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

JF - Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

SN - 0301-5629

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 221833008