Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives. / Schroter, Sara; Groves, Trish; Højgaard, Liselotte.

In: B M C Medicine, Vol. 8, 01.01.2010, p. 62.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Schroter, S, Groves, T & Højgaard, L 2010, 'Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives', B M C Medicine, vol. 8, pp. 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-62

APA

Schroter, S., Groves, T., & Højgaard, L. (2010). Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives. B M C Medicine, 8, 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-62

Vancouver

Schroter S, Groves T, Højgaard L. Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives. B M C Medicine. 2010 Jan 1;8:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-62

Author

Schroter, Sara ; Groves, Trish ; Højgaard, Liselotte. / Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives. In: B M C Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 8. pp. 62.

Bibtex

@article{80136f14ad344305b8f8c69054d9c3a3,
title = "Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives",
abstract = "The objectives of this research were (a) to describe the current status of grant review for biomedical projects and programmes from the perspectives of international funding organisations and grant reviewers, and (b) to explore funders' interest in developing uniform requirements for grant review aimed at making the processes and practices of grant review more consistent, transparent, and user friendly.",
author = "Sara Schroter and Trish Groves and Liselotte H{\o}jgaard",
year = "2010",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-62",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "62",
journal = "BMC Medicine",
issn = "1741-7015",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives

AU - Schroter, Sara

AU - Groves, Trish

AU - Højgaard, Liselotte

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The objectives of this research were (a) to describe the current status of grant review for biomedical projects and programmes from the perspectives of international funding organisations and grant reviewers, and (b) to explore funders' interest in developing uniform requirements for grant review aimed at making the processes and practices of grant review more consistent, transparent, and user friendly.

AB - The objectives of this research were (a) to describe the current status of grant review for biomedical projects and programmes from the perspectives of international funding organisations and grant reviewers, and (b) to explore funders' interest in developing uniform requirements for grant review aimed at making the processes and practices of grant review more consistent, transparent, and user friendly.

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-62

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-62

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 62

JO - BMC Medicine

JF - BMC Medicine

SN - 1741-7015

ER -

ID: 34044914