Increasing capacity to deliver diabetes self-management education: Results of the DESMOND lay educator non-randomized controlled equivalence trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Increasing capacity to deliver diabetes self-management education : Results of the DESMOND lay educator non-randomized controlled equivalence trial. / Carey, M. E.; Mandalia, P. K.; Daly, H.; Gray, L. J.; Hale, R.; Martin Stacey, L.; Taub, N.; Skinner, T. C.; Stone, M.; Heller, S.; Khunti, K.; Davies, M. J.

In: Diabetic Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 11, 01.01.2014, p. 1431-1438.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Carey, ME, Mandalia, PK, Daly, H, Gray, LJ, Hale, R, Martin Stacey, L, Taub, N, Skinner, TC, Stone, M, Heller, S, Khunti, K & Davies, MJ 2014, 'Increasing capacity to deliver diabetes self-management education: Results of the DESMOND lay educator non-randomized controlled equivalence trial', Diabetic Medicine, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1431-1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12483

APA

Carey, M. E., Mandalia, P. K., Daly, H., Gray, L. J., Hale, R., Martin Stacey, L., Taub, N., Skinner, T. C., Stone, M., Heller, S., Khunti, K., & Davies, M. J. (2014). Increasing capacity to deliver diabetes self-management education: Results of the DESMOND lay educator non-randomized controlled equivalence trial. Diabetic Medicine, 31(11), 1431-1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12483

Vancouver

Carey ME, Mandalia PK, Daly H, Gray LJ, Hale R, Martin Stacey L et al. Increasing capacity to deliver diabetes self-management education: Results of the DESMOND lay educator non-randomized controlled equivalence trial. Diabetic Medicine. 2014 Jan 1;31(11):1431-1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12483

Author

Carey, M. E. ; Mandalia, P. K. ; Daly, H. ; Gray, L. J. ; Hale, R. ; Martin Stacey, L. ; Taub, N. ; Skinner, T. C. ; Stone, M. ; Heller, S. ; Khunti, K. ; Davies, M. J. / Increasing capacity to deliver diabetes self-management education : Results of the DESMOND lay educator non-randomized controlled equivalence trial. In: Diabetic Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 31, No. 11. pp. 1431-1438.

Bibtex

@article{b84d8a7b69de482882824216c47be926,
title = "Increasing capacity to deliver diabetes self-management education: Results of the DESMOND lay educator non-randomized controlled equivalence trial",
abstract = "Aim: To develop and test a format of delivery of diabetes self-management education by paired professional and lay educators. Methods: We conducted an equivalence trial with non-randomized participant allocation to a Diabetes Education and Self Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed Type 2 diabetes (DESMOND) course, delivered in the standard format by two trained healthcare professional educators (to the control group) or by one trained lay educator and one professional educator (to the intervention group). A total of 260 people with Type 2 diabetes diagnosed within the previous 12 months were referred for self-management education as part of routine care and attended either a control or intervention format DESMOND course. The primary outcome measure was change in illness coherence score (derived from the Diabetes Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised) between baseline and 4 months after attending education sessions. Secondary outcome measures included change in HbA1c level. The trial was conducted in four primary care organizations across England and Scotland. Results: The 95% CI for the between-group difference in positive change in coherence scores was within the pre-set limits of equivalence (difference = 0.22, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.52). Equivalent changes related to secondary outcome measures were also observed, including equivalent reductions in HbA1c levels. Conclusion: Diabetes education delivered jointly by a trained lay person and a healthcare professional educator with the same educator role can provide equivalent patient benefits. This could provide a method that increases capacity, maintains quality and is cost-effective, while increasing access to self-management education.",
author = "Carey, {M. E.} and Mandalia, {P. K.} and H. Daly and Gray, {L. J.} and R. Hale and {Martin Stacey}, L. and N. Taub and Skinner, {T. C.} and M. Stone and S. Heller and K. Khunti and Davies, {M. J.}",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/dme.12483",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1431--1438",
journal = "Diabetic Medicine Online",
issn = "1464-5491",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing capacity to deliver diabetes self-management education

T2 - Results of the DESMOND lay educator non-randomized controlled equivalence trial

AU - Carey, M. E.

AU - Mandalia, P. K.

AU - Daly, H.

AU - Gray, L. J.

AU - Hale, R.

AU - Martin Stacey, L.

AU - Taub, N.

AU - Skinner, T. C.

AU - Stone, M.

AU - Heller, S.

AU - Khunti, K.

AU - Davies, M. J.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Aim: To develop and test a format of delivery of diabetes self-management education by paired professional and lay educators. Methods: We conducted an equivalence trial with non-randomized participant allocation to a Diabetes Education and Self Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed Type 2 diabetes (DESMOND) course, delivered in the standard format by two trained healthcare professional educators (to the control group) or by one trained lay educator and one professional educator (to the intervention group). A total of 260 people with Type 2 diabetes diagnosed within the previous 12 months were referred for self-management education as part of routine care and attended either a control or intervention format DESMOND course. The primary outcome measure was change in illness coherence score (derived from the Diabetes Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised) between baseline and 4 months after attending education sessions. Secondary outcome measures included change in HbA1c level. The trial was conducted in four primary care organizations across England and Scotland. Results: The 95% CI for the between-group difference in positive change in coherence scores was within the pre-set limits of equivalence (difference = 0.22, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.52). Equivalent changes related to secondary outcome measures were also observed, including equivalent reductions in HbA1c levels. Conclusion: Diabetes education delivered jointly by a trained lay person and a healthcare professional educator with the same educator role can provide equivalent patient benefits. This could provide a method that increases capacity, maintains quality and is cost-effective, while increasing access to self-management education.

AB - Aim: To develop and test a format of delivery of diabetes self-management education by paired professional and lay educators. Methods: We conducted an equivalence trial with non-randomized participant allocation to a Diabetes Education and Self Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed Type 2 diabetes (DESMOND) course, delivered in the standard format by two trained healthcare professional educators (to the control group) or by one trained lay educator and one professional educator (to the intervention group). A total of 260 people with Type 2 diabetes diagnosed within the previous 12 months were referred for self-management education as part of routine care and attended either a control or intervention format DESMOND course. The primary outcome measure was change in illness coherence score (derived from the Diabetes Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised) between baseline and 4 months after attending education sessions. Secondary outcome measures included change in HbA1c level. The trial was conducted in four primary care organizations across England and Scotland. Results: The 95% CI for the between-group difference in positive change in coherence scores was within the pre-set limits of equivalence (difference = 0.22, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.52). Equivalent changes related to secondary outcome measures were also observed, including equivalent reductions in HbA1c levels. Conclusion: Diabetes education delivered jointly by a trained lay person and a healthcare professional educator with the same educator role can provide equivalent patient benefits. This could provide a method that increases capacity, maintains quality and is cost-effective, while increasing access to self-management education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908096231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/dme.12483

DO - 10.1111/dme.12483

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24798205

AN - SCOPUS:84908096231

VL - 31

SP - 1431

EP - 1438

JO - Diabetic Medicine Online

JF - Diabetic Medicine Online

SN - 1464-5491

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 189872405