Allosteric transition: a comparison of two models

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Allosteric transition: a comparison of two models. / Bindslev, Niels.

In: British Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2013, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bindslev, N 2013, 'Allosteric transition: a comparison of two models', British Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-14-4

APA

Bindslev, N. (2013). Allosteric transition: a comparison of two models. British Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 14(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-14-4

Vancouver

Bindslev N. Allosteric transition: a comparison of two models. British Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2013;14(4):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-14-4

Author

Bindslev, Niels. / Allosteric transition: a comparison of two models. In: British Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2013 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 1-12.

Bibtex

@article{460b9b8a7a25423ea30c4e1dce0ae8d0,
title = "Allosteric transition: a comparison of two models",
abstract = "IntroductionTwo recent models are in use for analysis of allosteric drug action at receptor sites remote from orthosteric binding sites. One is an allosteric two-state mechanical model derived in 2000 by David Hall. The other is an extended operational model developed in 2007 by Arthur Christopoulos’s group. The models are valid in pharmacology, enzymology, transportology as well as several other fields of biology involving allosteric concentration effects.ResultsI show here that Hall’s model for interactions between an orthoster, an alloster, and a receptive unit is the best choice of model both for simulation and analysis of allosteric concentration-responses at equilibrium or steady-state.ConclusionsAs detailed knowledge of receptors systems becomes available, systems with several pathways and states and/ or more than two binding sites should be analysed by extended forms of the Hall model rather than for instance a Hill type exponentiation of terms as introduced in non-mechanistic (operational) model approaches; yielding semi-quantitative estimates of actual system parameters based on Hill’s unlikely simultaneity model for G protein-coupled receptors",
author = "Niels Bindslev",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1186/2050-6511-14-4",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "British Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology",
issn = "2044-2459",
publisher = "Maxwell Science Publications",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Allosteric transition: a comparison of two models

AU - Bindslev, Niels

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - IntroductionTwo recent models are in use for analysis of allosteric drug action at receptor sites remote from orthosteric binding sites. One is an allosteric two-state mechanical model derived in 2000 by David Hall. The other is an extended operational model developed in 2007 by Arthur Christopoulos’s group. The models are valid in pharmacology, enzymology, transportology as well as several other fields of biology involving allosteric concentration effects.ResultsI show here that Hall’s model for interactions between an orthoster, an alloster, and a receptive unit is the best choice of model both for simulation and analysis of allosteric concentration-responses at equilibrium or steady-state.ConclusionsAs detailed knowledge of receptors systems becomes available, systems with several pathways and states and/ or more than two binding sites should be analysed by extended forms of the Hall model rather than for instance a Hill type exponentiation of terms as introduced in non-mechanistic (operational) model approaches; yielding semi-quantitative estimates of actual system parameters based on Hill’s unlikely simultaneity model for G protein-coupled receptors

AB - IntroductionTwo recent models are in use for analysis of allosteric drug action at receptor sites remote from orthosteric binding sites. One is an allosteric two-state mechanical model derived in 2000 by David Hall. The other is an extended operational model developed in 2007 by Arthur Christopoulos’s group. The models are valid in pharmacology, enzymology, transportology as well as several other fields of biology involving allosteric concentration effects.ResultsI show here that Hall’s model for interactions between an orthoster, an alloster, and a receptive unit is the best choice of model both for simulation and analysis of allosteric concentration-responses at equilibrium or steady-state.ConclusionsAs detailed knowledge of receptors systems becomes available, systems with several pathways and states and/ or more than two binding sites should be analysed by extended forms of the Hall model rather than for instance a Hill type exponentiation of terms as introduced in non-mechanistic (operational) model approaches; yielding semi-quantitative estimates of actual system parameters based on Hill’s unlikely simultaneity model for G protein-coupled receptors

U2 - 10.1186/2050-6511-14-4

DO - 10.1186/2050-6511-14-4

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - British Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology

JF - British Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology

SN - 2044-2459

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 47894887